Split Bahraini notes [opgelost]

We currently group Bahrain 5 dinars P#14 & 20:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note217066.html
and 10 dinars P#15 & 21:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note217067.html
with notes that P#20 and 21 have microprinting on the security thread. However, this ignores the fact that P#20 and 21 have additional holograms in the bottom left corner of the obverse:
http://banknote.ws/COLLECTION/countries/ASI/BHR/BHR0020.htm
http://banknote.ws/COLLECTION/countries/ASI/BHR/BHR0021.htm
I suggest that we split these pairs into individual entries to reflect this more significant difference.

I've created two new entries for this notes, and requested the members to be moved.

This is really unnecessary since it already, very clearly is stated with microprinting "BMA" on security thread and without microprinting on security thread. By splitting these two, we will have to split basically the whole Belarussian catalogue, as well as many many many more lkstings, just to be consistent. Do not split!

The point is that there is a bigger difference between these notes than the microprinting, namely the additional hologram. If you look at the images on Bank Note Museum (linked in my first post) you can see this. I agree that microprinting alone might not be sufficient to split but that isn't the case here.

Citeer: "ngdawa"​This is really unnecessary since it already, very clearly is stated with microprinting "BMA" on security thread and without microprinting on security thread. By splitting these two, we will have to split basically the whole Belarussian catalogue, as well as many many many more lkstings, just to be consistent. Do not split!

​So I guess that's your downvote... Maybe read the whole thing next time?

Citeer: "allexis"

Citeer: "ngdawa"​This is really unnecessary since it already, very clearly is stated with microprinting "BMA" on security thread and without microprinting on security thread. By splitting these two, we will have to split basically the whole Belarussian catalogue, as well as many many many more lkstings, just to be consistent. Do not split!

​​So I guess that's your downvote... Maybe read the whole thing next time?

​Why donyou addume I didn't read the whole thing? Becayse I don't agree with you?

Citeer: "ceh2019"​The point is that there is a bigger difference between these notes than the microprinting, namely the additional hologram. If you look at the images on Bank Note Museum (linked in my first post) you can see this. I agree that microprinting alone might not be sufficient to split but that isn't the case here.

Of course ​I have looked at the links, but I still can't find the huge difference of the additional hologram.

Here are the notes in question:


The additional hologram is bottom left.

Citeer: "ngdawa"​

Citeer: "allexis"​

Citeer: "ngdawa"​This is really unnecessary since it already, very clearly is stated with microprinting "BMA" on security thread and without microprinting on security thread. By splitting these two, we will have to split basically the whole Belarussian catalogue, as well as many many many more lkstings, just to be consistent. Do not split!

​​​So I guess that's your downvote... Maybe read the whole thing next time?

​​Why donyou addume I didn't read the whole thing? Becayse I don't agree with you?

​You don't have to agree with me but the difference is clear.

Citeer: "ceh2019"​Here are the notes in question:
​
​
​The additional hologram is bottom left.

​Ah, yes! When they are dksplayed like this - next to each other, it's much easier to notice the differencies. While jumping tabs tbe detailes are lost and eventually everything looks the same. Cheers!

This is done. Thank you.