USA: 50cents km202b and kma202b, not nice looking, to be split? [opgelost]

N#6918

Either split or add km# to all year lines! I prefer the splitting?

Not sure it makes sense to split them.  There is no difference in design, composition, dimensions between them.  The only difference is the KM number. I'd prefer a general comment such as:

1971 through 1974 are KM# 202b

1977 to date are KM# A202b

There is no difference between them.

and remove the KM numbers from all the year lines.

I can agree to that. Can you make the CR, please?

Yes. Done.

If we're on this page, let's correct this: “The reprisal of KM#202b issue mintage after 1977 as KM#A202b” 

Maybe a “restrike”? 

Dejan

If we're on this page, let's correct this: “The reprisal of KM#202b issue mintage after 1977 as KM#A202b” 

Maybe a “restrike”? 

I didn't like that sentence either.  I've already submitted the CR with:

The reverse design of 1974 was resumed in 1977.
Coins minted in 1971 through 1974 are KM# 202b
Coins minted in 1977 to date are KM# A202b
There is no difference between them.

OK?

For me, yes