The figures we have there are based on the Standard Catalog of World Coins published by Krause and they tell us that the mintage for the 1293/32 is included in the mintage for the 1293/33, in other words if you add together the 1906 and 1907 issues they would come to 300,000. As for value, this is what my 2010 38th edition has:
Date Mintage F VF XF Unc
AH1293/32 (1906) Inc. below 30.00 100 200 400
Just because you can't see it ... doesn't mean it isn't there - Anon.
Citeer: @josephjkLooks like the dates on the Numista sheet are wrong for KM296 - instead of 1293, the dates run into the 1300s. 1293 is a frozen date on the coin
I'm not sure you can necessarily say that page is wrong. There seems to be a mixture of protocols used across the whole range of Ottoman coinage on Numista. The page in question lists the years that the different issues were struck, using both Hijri and Gregorian calendars, and the accession year and regnal year are indicated in the comment field. It is not ideal but given the standard layout of the Numista listing page, it is one way of doing it.
Just because you can't see it ... doesn't mean it isn't there - Anon.
Yes, you're right, there are at least 2 if not 3 different formats for Egpytian/Turkish/Ottoman listings here on Numista and I would also have to agree that Krause and NGC more accurately list the dates by accession and regnal year, e.g. 1293/32. However, currently we do not have that facility on Numista and to list only the accession year in the date field, e.g. every coin in the series has AH1293, is, in my opinion, incorrect and misleading. Until such time as Xavier can modify the site to correctly accomodate these types of coinage then there should perhaps be a conference among the catalog administrators to arrive at a single, common protocol.
Just because you can't see it ... doesn't mean it isn't there - Anon.
