Idolenz
You can't extrapolate “rarity” from the NRI this is said ad nauseam.
In order if relative importance, you are comparing:
- a quite old catalog entry #89878 to a very new one #451753, less time for people to add to their collection.
- a more modern 19th century coin to a 17th century one, a considerable difference for smaller mintage coins
- a relatively small collection field Swiss coins to an either very much smaller Öttingen-Wallenstein or a gigantic one HRE, the chance for somebody to collect a specific coin gets much smaller
Of course you can, the rarity of over 250.000 members who don’t own the coin - it has a NRI (Numista Rarity Index) of 100, it is extremely extremely rare on this site as compared to a coin that has a NRI of 99, 98, 97, shall I continue?
As for your points;
- if anyone had owned this coin it would have been added earlier, thus having a older catalog entry. But no one did, because no one owned it, because it’s rare. So catalog number (and thus time on Numista is irrelevant).
- I wasn’t comparing coins, just using one as an example with a different NRI to point out how the NRI works.
- again irrelevant, using as an example.
Idolenz, it is good that you wanted to poo poo my comment instead of answering the original question. Which is all I was trying to do, by conveying the rarity.
„If your reply or post in the Forum stinks of AI, I will call you out! Knowledge comes from experience, the I in AI stands for incompetence.“