According to wikipedia, it wasn't nationalized (state was the biggest shareholder though), but it was created by royal decree, and it seems that it acted similarly to banks for foreign trade in many socialist countries. So here I'd say it is official
This set must be official, because it has name of the mint on the cover, the cover is of the same format as the earlier sets (Franco sets and 1975-1979, which are definitely official), and coins here actually resemble proof coins. Because in most previous sets they looked like business strikes
I'm away from home for a few days. I'll check it as soon as I get back, but it's true that many unofficial sets were released. I think I have the official FNMT set in my collection, so I'll try to reply when I get there.
The case of Spanish coin sets ("carteras o carteritas") before the introduction of the Euro is quite complex, as many were issued, as you have explained in this topic, by many different organizations. In fact, in serious numismatic shops in Spain, any of them are sold interchangeably.
The most officially recognized set seems to be the one bearing the mint mark of the National Mint (FNMT), the crowned M, but I know that many collectors, even of Spanish coins, possess other, supposedly unofficial, sets, since the internal format is very similar in all of them.
I'm sorry I can't contribute much more than what's already been said. Perhaps another referee from Spain can offer additional information.
Maybe the question now is which sets should be included in Numista, considering there's no official guideliness on the matter and it would be a shame if users who own some of these sets—which aren't the typical tourist sets—were unable to add them to their Numista collection.
Coin referee for: Andorra, Equatorial Guinea, Marshall Islands, Moldova, Liberia and Spain
Banknote referee for: Andorra, Equatorial Guinea and Spain
My biggest concern is regarding the fact that the official set is supposed to contain proof coins, while the unoffcial ones logically should contain general uncirculated coins.
Therefore listing the unofficial sets (specially with proof coins) would be incorrect and misleading.
I was checking some Spanish shops, and from those it also seems that only the one with mint logo is official. For example in both of these stores they only list that set as official:
These sets were issued between 1971-1989, and every year there were multiple colors. And besides the official ones, one “unofficial” set was also issued every year. So not to make too many different sets, I just added one by year, and mentioned the varieties (including unofficial one) in the comments.
That case was much simpler though, because all coins were simple business strikes
We lack guidelines about sets; we only know Xavier's intentions when he released this feature.
"We define sets as official packaging from the mint containing one or several numismatic items. It contains only new items (not repackaging of older coins). We just don't allow sets that were made by a different person or company than the mint or the issuing entity. Sets made by a third party from coins in circulation are not allowed." (Xavier)
Referee for Spain, Iberia (ancient), Suebi Kingdom and Visigothic Kingdom