Chinese Cash ID Please [opgelost]

16 berichten

» Snelle toegang tot het laatste bericht

Would one of our Chinese experts kindly take a look at this lot and let me know if there is anything of more than modest value. I'll be auctioning them on Listia (unless anyone here would like them) as a lot but I'd like to know if  there is anything here worth listing individually.




Thanks in anticipation.
Non illegitimis carborundum est.  Excellent advice for all coins.
Make Numismatics Great Again!  
Hello, what would you say of that ?

Referee of south atlantic islands
this make identification easier:
Non est totum quod splendet ut aurum
Rijkdom bestaat niet uit het hebben van veel bezittingen, maar in het hebben van weinig behoeften
I can tell you for some coins/replicas what is written on it, but I am not sure if they are real
#1
obv : Kuang-hsü Tong-bao
rev : Boo-jin, mint : Kuang, kanton Kwantung
ruler : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guangxu_Emperor
I think it is not a real coin

#2, #3
idem

#4
charm, not a coin
( http://primaltrek.com/ )

#5
obv : Chien-lung Tong-bao
rev : to worn
ruler: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qianlong_Emperor
might be real
Non est totum quod splendet ut aurum
Rijkdom bestaat niet uit het hebben van veel bezittingen, maar in het hebben van weinig behoeften
Citeer: PetrusAscanusrev : Boo-jin, mint : Kuang, kanton Kwantung

I think it is not a real coin
1. real coin
2. rv:  boo-guang / guwang
3............
I am always prudent on chinese coin.
But yes, you can be right.
Note that there are several ways to write and pronounce the writing on these coins, depending on the used source.

#6: see #3

#7
obv : Shun-chih Tong-bao
rev : Boo-Ciowan, mint : Hu-Pu board of revenu
ruler: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shunzhi_Emperor
looks real

#8
very worn
ruler: ?  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daoguang_Emperor
Non est totum quod splendet ut aurum
Rijkdom bestaat niet uit het hebben van veel bezittingen, maar in het hebben van weinig behoeften
9 looks real to me. 8.
#9
yes can be real
obv : Chien-lung Tong-bao
rev : Boo-j'i, mint : Hu-Pu board of revenu
ruler: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qianlong_Emperor

#10
can be real
obv : Chien-lung Tong-bao
rev : Boo-j'i, mint : Paoting
ruler: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qianlong_Emperor

#11
not sure but looks like:
obv : Chien-ch'ing Tong-bao
rev : Boo-yon, mint : Hu-Pu board of revenu
ruler: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jiaqing_Emperor

#12
the dotted background makes me think of a replica
 obv : Chien-lung Tong-bao
 rev : Boo-j'i, mint : Hu-Pu board of revenu
 ruler: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qianlong_Emperor

#13
the dotted background makes me think of a replica
 obv : Chien-lung Tong-bao
 rev : Boo-j'i, mint : Board of Public Works
 ruler: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qianlong_Emperor

#14
looks real but very worn

corrections welcome
Non est totum quod splendet ut aurum
Rijkdom bestaat niet uit het hebben van veel bezittingen, maar in het hebben van weinig behoeften
PetrusAscanus , probably the most helping person on numista :)
you have no idea about chinese cash...
9. rv: boo-chiowan
10. rv: boo-jyi
11. rv: boo-chiowan
12. rv: boo-chiowan
13. rv: boo-yuwan
I just try, but always leaves a door open for corrections.
Indeed I am no expert in cash coins :`
I just compare with the books
Non est totum quod splendet ut aurum
Rijkdom bestaat niet uit het hebben van veel bezittingen, maar in het hebben van weinig behoeften
No, I am serious, you really jump and help anyone.
Citeer: PetrusAscanusthis make identification easier:
in my view....

1. Guangxu, Boo-Guwang, Y# 191
2. Guangxu, Boo-Guwang, Y# 190
3. Guangxu, Boo-Guwang, Y# 190
4. Token
5. Qianlong, worm,unclear
6. Guangxu, Boo-Guwang, Y# 190
7. Shunzhi Boo-chiowan, FD# 2233
8. Shengsong, Running script, FD# 1018
9. Qianlong, Boo-chiowan, FD# 2297
10. Qianlong,Boo-ji, FD# 2325
11. Kangxi, Boo-chiowan, FD# 2250
12. Qianlong, Boo-chiowan, FD# 2297
13. Qianlong, Boo-yuwan, FD# 2306
14. Yuanfeng, Seal script, FD# 964

all real for me
common types
not have much value

 :P
These Guangxu coins have misled me, there are not old indeed and the first coin is even not molded. :8D that's why I thought they were fake
Referee of south atlantic islands
Citeer: PetrusAscanusI can tell you for some coins/replicas what is written on it, but I am not sure if they are real
#1
obv : Kuang-hsü Tong-bao
rev : Boo-jin, mint : Kuang, kanton Kwantung
ruler : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guangxu_Emperor
I think it is not a real coin
Machine-struck coin, it's real but not very valuable, maybe a dollar.
Kenny

- Verifying your Asian and British-territorial coins everyday with the best quality photos and the best information.

Check out my Facebook, Kenneth Gucyski.
Gentlemen, thank you for the in depth responses. I am most grateful to each of you.
Non illegitimis carborundum est.  Excellent advice for all coins.
Make Numismatics Great Again!  

» Forumbeleid

Gebruikte tijdzone is UCT+2:00.
Huidige tijd is 22:13.