Aidan,
Since the two different denominations were not running in parallel in the same years, why complicate things with two sections? Why would it be better, more precise or more accurate?
Ole
Aidan,
there you see, you brought up the best example of all, IRELAND. Ireland is NOT split into TWO sections, so why should Cyprus be split, there is no reason for it at all.
Ole
As you can see Ole, Ireland IS split, even in FOUR sections in stead of TWO.
But maybe you make a wrong interpretation and you think he wants to split Cyprus into two country entries in stead of two sections within the same country?
OK, I see what you (he) mean(s), but I still don't see the necessity of doing it? Have you also split the European countries according to before and after the introduction of the euro? What does it bring me as a user of numista?
Ole
He means two separate currencies, for example Ireland has predecimal, decimal, euro. Cyprus would be exactly the same, we wouldnt lump together euros and shillings, would we?
Kenny
- Verifying your Asian and British-territorial coins everyday with the best quality photos and the best information.