Canadian 1 cent 2002 KM#445 Golden Jubilee, Why does the non-magnetic and magnetic have the same KM number?

The 1 cent KM#490 2003-2012 non-magnetic. Then the 1 cent KM# 490a 2003-2012 magnetic, are separated.
But the 1 cent KM# 445 2002 golden Jubilee has both non-magnetic and magnetic under the same KM number.
I don't have an up to date catalog, and don't see a different KM number for the two on the web. Am I missing something? Should one be KM# 445a?
yours daryl

Good question Daryl. Even in the latest edition there's no difference:



According to Krause (in contrast to the Numista catalog) they both are even made from the same alloy.
I only have the 2002P so I can't verify if there is a difference in alloy/magnetism between the 2002 and the 2002P. Do you have both to check the difference?

Anyway, even if they are different we can't give them another KM# number. These numbers are given by Krause and should be given by Krause only. If everybody is going to give KM# numbers of their own, it's going to be an incalculable mess.

I have both , and just rechecked. I have 2002 no mint mark non-magnetic. the 2002 P I have is magnetic. Just like are catalog. I wonder if this a Krause issue , or if I have a mule. I think this is a Krause issue.

In recent years there are a lot of mistakes in Krause. I guess this is just another one.

There is no way I would want to gave out Km numbers. But it will be interesting to see what our Canadian friends have to say on this one.

A Charlton Standard Catalogue Canadian Coins Volume One , Numismatic Issues 2015, 69th Edition, W. K. Cross has two coins listed separately in both magnetic and non-magnetic sections:

So Krause error. Not the first

Oh were are my manners ,Thank you Donkey for your help and time

Don't mention it ALLRED. It's been my pleasure. btw, I'll try to look for the nickels and dimes 1970 you need.