In the article
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces23187.html
The Reverse section gives a list of mints:
NOTE: Different mintmarks
♦ (small dot/diamond) = Mumbai
(no mintmark) = Calcutta
* (five-pointed star) = Hyderabad
° (circular dot) = Noida
The year distribution section introduces Kolkata Mint
Does it mean, that there is a misspelling and instead of Kolkata Mint there should be Calcutta Mint
or the mint marks of Kolkata Mint should be added to the Reverse section?
Till now there are only 3 mints for this type. Why there is information about Noida mint here as well? Is it just copy-and-paste mistake or the year distribution is not complete?