Banknotes with minor differences on same page

3 berichten • 43 keer bekeken
I thought that is ok to have very similar banknotes with different catalog numbers on the same page. I don't see the point of creating a new entry for different watermarks. It's really annoying to find out that your editing was rejected by a referee that just want it his way. I could do something else with me free time.
I do not personally care for combined listings. I think that there are many good reasons why Pick created different listings in the first place.

Different imprints: almost like mintmarks but different. Different Guilloche/lathe work, engravers.

Different sizes

Different colors

Different wording

Different watermarks

All are great reasons to have different listings. And most collectors coming here have their notes attributed. Mixing listings could be confusing.

But decisions have not been made as to final style. I approve mixed listings unless one is presented, and one or both listings already exist as seperated pages.

Watermarks are a big deal in note differentiation. but if you create a combined listing then say the differences on the date line or in comments.

Your work is well recieved I imagine your reject rate is extremely low, less than 1 percent. Please continue helping out.
Library Media Specialist, columnist, collector, and gardener...
Citeer. I approve mixed listings unless one is presented, and one or both listings already exist as seperated pages.
​I guess every referee should do that until the final decision is taken. Otherwise why should i start editing an entry knowing it could get rejected. Those year lines don't write themselves.
Topic verplaatst naar "Numista banknote catalog" (ZacUK, 6-mei-2020, 12:30)

» Forumbeleid

Gebruikte tijdzone is UCT+2:00.
Huidige tijd is 13:52.